For housebuilders, developers and M&E contractors overseeing new build completions, a failed Part F ventilation test isn’t just an inconvenience – it can hold up practical completion, trigger remedial works and add re-test costs at exactly the point in a project when time matters most. Understanding what the test actually checks, and why systems fail it as often as they do, is the difference between passing first time and losing weeks to it.

Part F of the building regulations sets out ventilation standards for domestic and non-domestic new-build properties, covering both intermittent extract (IE) and continuous extract (CE) requirements for kitchens, utility rooms, bathrooms and WCs. The rules exist to ensure good indoor air quality and prevent the condensation that leads to black mould – so compliance isn’t just a box-ticking exercise, it’s what keeps a finished building healthy to live or work in.

For the full breakdown of what Part F covers and how it relates to Part L air tightness requirements, see our guide: Part F Building Regulations: What are they?

Table of Part F minimum extract ventilation rates by room, showing intermittent and continuous extract values in litres per second for kitchen (IE: 30 next to hob, 60 elsewhere. CE: 13), utility room (IE: 30, CE: 8), bathroom (IE: 15, CE: 8) and WCs (IE: 6, CE 6).
Part F minimum extract ventilation rates (l/s) by room type

An experienced tester checks every extract vent in a property using a balometer – a piece of equipment that measures airflow directly at the vent. It’s a quick process, with results calculated in seconds per vent, but it’s testing real installed performance, not the manufacturer’s rated output.

That distinction matters. Extract fans come with a performance rating in litres per second, but once installed, most don’t perform to that rating – which is exactly why testing, rather than assuming compliance from the spec sheet, is a legal requirement for new build developments and is usually requested by building control bodies.

Fan underperformance on installation is common enough to be the norm rather the exception. A landmark UK study by the Zero Carbon Hub investigating widespread underperformance in UK new build ventilation found that at 5 out of 6 test sites, extract fans operated at half their required airflow or failed outright.

The most common causes of failure come down to installation, not equipment quality:

Getting this right comes down to planning before installation, not fixing after testing:

Do and Don't diagram of flexible ducting installation: correct routing with supports and a wide bend radius on the left, incorrect routing with peaks, troughs and restrictions on the right
Correct vs incorrect flexible ducting installation for extract ventilation

On a nine-home development for Woodstock Homes, testing a single plot ahead of full completion surfaced leakage risks at typical junctions and service entries early enough to fix across the remaining plots before final testing. The result: all nine plots passed air tightness and ventilation testing first time, with zero retests.

Failing means one of two routes: fixing the ductwork or installation issues, or replacing fans with higher-quality units better suited to the duct run – sometimes both. Either way, a re-test has to be booked and paid for, on top of the cost of remedial work itself. Getting it right first time avoids that delay and expense entirely.

What’s Next?

Passing Part F ventilation testing first time comes down to planning ahead, not troubleshooting after the fact. Our experienced team can advise at the design stage, identify likely failure points before they’re built in and carry out the test itself.

If you’d like advice ahead of a Part F test or need testing scheduled for a project nearing completion, get in touch.

Keep Informed

Get practical insights on retrofit, decarbonisation and compliance, delivered straight to your inbox.

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.